HOW TO REDUCE A RISK IN TESTING OUTSOURCING

Today more and more companies and corporations use staff outsourcing and even the whole companies working remotely and offering their customers a certain package deal of personal services and solutions.

Let's analyze such relations through employing a remote number of testers (QA specialists) for a task, who should absolutely successfully and qualitatively test our product and deliver all of us a finished report that everything works, everything is OK, so a customer will be completely satisfied.

But we don't know will we be satisfied since such a type of relations (remote) could possibly be the reason for numerous dangers and prevention which is often a level of an impact of one more release or the whole build of software in development.

Just what exactly should we generally understand and how does indeed QA outsourcing work, what are its advantages and how to cope with risks will not your company really desire a selection of remote control testers?

We will examine this below.

THE MISUNDERSTANDINGS BETWEEN OUTSOURCING AND OUTSTAFFING:

It's really very easy to be confused between these conditions and descriptions. Particularly if 2 conditions have a similar meaning.

To eliminate the confusions, we ought to identify the key features of these 2 conditions to put the same sign between the terms.

Testing outsourcing techniques is executing determined jobs on testing features of the software. The builder takes the responsibility to perform all the necessary work with the aid of remote resources.

The most interesting thing is that the inside workings of testing outsourced workers is usually unknown and not available for clients: a client only gets an important result.

Testing outstaffing is a process of employing staff to present a group of skilled employees of a particular field (QA, back-end, front end, etc. ) to the project. Issues on implementing and organizing the work of such employees are solved by an overseer of a company which employed them.

Everything is pretty clear but there is the key question: how to reduce risks from outsource testing on the project? Where do we find a set of risks and weaknesses which can completely destroy a project in development or seriously extend the deadline of its release?

Although before analyzing the dangers, we have to identify the factors with which IT companies use the services of specialists working remotely.

THE POSITIVE ASPECTS OF OUTSOURCING

It's right to start out with good things when analyzing a bad one.

PROPER DISTRIBUTION OF FUNCTIONAL LOAD

Frequently, an IT company meets the stage of "temporary need" of a particular selection of testers. A good example of such a practice is a testing office which can have zero work for weeks but then for years float looking for features of a product in development.

Freelancing allows us to properly control the workload of employees. when they reach mentioned overload, it's good to hire a group of outsource testers for a project to properly and, the key thing, qualitatively make the merchandise for a last release and do not pay a salary to employees which are not occupied when there is no work.

REDUCING THE EXPENSES OF UTILIZING NEW PEOPLE

We can say for sure that a form of remote control employment of employees allows us to spend much less money on the salary of the specialist but there is also a number of uncertain factors:

Rental associated with an office;

Purchasing necessary equipment;

Recruitment;

Formalization of employees.

Also, we can which the factors described above need not only costs but also time.

A LOOK FROM ANOTHER POINT OF VIEW

Don't be surprised since even the most professional and mature team of web developers has to be plainly analyzed with a third-party which will allow us to identify the particular disadvantages of any product in development.

EXECUTING A PARTICULAR GROUP OF DUTIES

Sometimes we lose control over creating necessary information and technical documentation of a project while sporting huge releases and executing basic tasks. In some time, such omissions can lead to decreasing productivity.

These kinds of work (for example, writing test cases for a typical product) can be transmitted to a web-affiliated team of specialists.

DOWN SIDES OF TESTING OUTSOURCING

A lot of customers started to say that the outsource type of testing is today too overrated. We have to talk about that such a point should be analyzed quite carefully since every product in development is unique and its price can (and will) vary mostly due to amount of the testing performed, popularity of testing (in other words, a fair balance between its qualification and quality of the work done. )

To find the right decision, we must get answers to such questions: how long has your QA team been executing outsource testing? What timeframes do they suggest? Include they got reviews on specialized web platforms (forums, social networks)? How do they plan to build the process of your mutual work?

It's reasonable to guess that the more requirements you gives them, the more expensive the outsource testing will be. This means that you as a customer need to set focal points and identify a group of primary plans.

SECURENESS MATTERS

Not all THIS companies are ready to give a mystery person the internal resources of the software product. Usually, to resolve this task, QA specialists need private access only to a certain area of software functionality or they sign a personal NDA - non-disclosure agreement.

Therefore before you give freelancer use of developed software, you should make certain that he will analyze all potential risks in the field of information security and understands all the hazards he/she may have.

To not argue and close with anyone, first find out a specialist that most the scripts created while assessment, test cases, and other technical documentation is an intellectual property of the consumer and can't be employed by a remote tester as he/she wishes.