5 Integrations for Powerful Automation Testing

We're living in a world where technology is advancing very fast, doing companies to spend money and efforts into developing smart applications to automate their operations and ensure that everything runs smoothly. "Quality at Speed" is a new quality standard that produces software developers utilize their greatest abilities to offer creative execution and reporting.

Automation testing plays an essential role in development operations toolchain as it helps applications developers powerful install and test artificial intelligence. However, effective automation testing can't be done without some high-generation tools. They help developers determine how to do better and automation deliver its benefits successfully.

Thus, this guide is going to show you the top five integrations you can use for successful automation analyzing, and present their own very best features and benefits.

5 Integrations for Powerful Automation Testing

Selenium

Various studies have revealed that nine from ten programmers have tried this tool. Why is Selenium so popular? The tool is extremely flexible. It is fairly unusual to see such versatility in an automation application. Users may write their scripts in a variety of languages.

For instance, they could use Java, Python, PHP, Ruby, or Perl, and have the ability to run this tool with them. Moreover, Selenium is compatible with different system environments and browsers. For this reason, you won't have some restrictions, whether you use Windows, Mac, or Linux, in addition to Chrome, Firefox, or Internet Explorer.

What's more, Selenium may be used at its very best performance by consumers with specialist programming experience. It needs a serious quantity of time and attempts to construct automation frameworks together using libraries. This can be regarded as a drawback, but they're extremely essential for a strong automation testing.

IBM Rational Functional Tester (RFT)

This is another fantastic tool used for integration testing because it may be used in a variety of languages and technologies. This testing stage is perfect for regression testing since it's data-driven.

On the flip side, RFT includes a special feature,"storyboard testing." Developers can use it to edit tests without a lot of complications. 

Natural language and software screenshots are sufficient to use storyboard testing efficiently. In addition, since it's a tool developed by IBM, Rational Functional Tester can also be used along with other lifecycle management applications designed by the same company. IBM Rational Team Concert and IBM Rational Quality Manager are just some examples of resources which may be utilized in combination with RFT.

Katalon Studio

Katalon Studio proudly occupies the third place in the testers' preferences, offering a complete set of attributes for Web, API, and Mobile. Compared with Selenium, Katalon Studio makes it much easier for the users to begin the automation analyzing and requires less experience and time spent from their side to conduct the tests successfully.

It doesn't need any programming skills as it's been developed for innovative test scripts. It doesn't have any licensing or maintenance fees. It's still possible to pay dedicated support services if needed. Being built on top of Selenium framework, its developers managed to eliminate the requirement for advanced programming skills, being easily integrated and analyzed.

On the flip side, Katalon Studio doesn't offer too many options when it comes to scripting languages. It merely supports Java and Groovy that may be seen as a drawback for some testers. On the other hand, the attribute keeps evolving, which might bring some pleasant surprises to the users in the future.

Unified Functional Testing (UFT)

Proudly occupying a place in the top 10 tastes in the consumers' preferences for automation testing tools, UFT can be used for testing for mobile, web, and desktop programs. It also includes a comprehensive set of features for a successful API testing. It is not difficult to use UFT for the smart object and image-based object detection together with correction.

Users have been impressed by this tool's intuitiveness when it comes to the creation, implementation, and reporting of API evaluations. Together with UFT it is also easier to generate API evaluations from WADL documents, this being a feature much appreciated by many testers.

Finally, each test action, action, and parameters can be visualized and tracked with diagrams. It only requires basic programming abilities, bringing the advantage of an integrated user support system and a rich and active community of users. However, it's a pricey solution, with license and maintenance fees reaching to over $3,000. On the flip side, it supports VBScript completely.

TestComplete

This list wouldn't be complete if we would not include TestComplete on the listing. It is one of the most favored solutions for several users thanks to its complete and powerful set of features, being compatible for Internet, mobile, and desktopcomputer. In regards to script languages, TestComplete is extremely generous, working great with JavaScript, VBScript, C++, and Python.

This automation testing integration also includes an extremely valuable feature as it includes an item search engine. Therefore, it gets extremely accurate when it comes to detecting dynamic user interface components. This instrument becomes a fantastic aid for software created with dynamic user interfaces. Its script creation time is fast, also using a medium learning curve.

Conclusion

In summary, automation testing is necessary, and programmers are extremely mindful of its importance. As there's absolutely no universal integration to meet all the market's requirements, testers should carefully evaluate each application's pros and cons until they jump to using it. The programming languages and technology evolve very quickly these days, which makes cost a substantial factor in picking one instrument over the other.

On the other hand, it ought to be the demands and the development plan which should count the most. Apart from the installation fees, users should also take into account the update possibility in addition to the chance to integrate this tool with others in use. A practical tool should support analytics, optimization, and smarter options on the way.